Comments

6 Responses to “Should the new health care laws cover fitness memberships?”
  1. Brent says:

    no but Anarchy needs to start to happen soon! or we’re all f*cked Brent

  2. Pascha says:

    In Germany health insurance covers doctor prescribed stays in spas. Pascha

  3. Michael C says:

    I refuse to pay for your gym membership. Our taxes already pay for public parks you can go run and exercise in. Michael C

  4. Lee B says:

    No. You can’t do push ups and sit ups at home? If you are getting started, a pair of dumbells = or < 20# is all you need.
    I agree that exercise is great, but I have bothered to purchase enough equipment (bench, mats, free weights, bike, step machine) over a period time to have no need to go to a gym.
    Going to a gym can be too social for some folks to stay focused. If you need that support, pay for it yourself. If I am paying for your gym membership and you aren't going, I want my money back. I expect you to go at least an average of twice per week for at least 20 minutes. How many people do you know who would/could honor this. Lee B

  5. STEVEN F says:

    The only NEW laws we need are REPEALS of old ones. MOST of the cost of health care results from COMPLYING with existing laws.

    Health club membership DOES NOT = more active people. I had such a membership for 2 years and actually entered the club less than 5 times. The clubs actually COUNT on that type of ‘client’. STEVEN F

  6. Question G says:

    The government already provides free exercise equipment. ‘It’s called ‘roads’ or ’sidewalks’ or ‘parks.’
    You can be fit and healthy without exercise equipment. People did it for hundreds of years. Question G

Speak Your Mind

Tell us what you're thinking...